Find Out More

Category: Compliance

  • Micro-Credentials, Badges, and SHSM: How Do These Compare?

    Micro-Credentials, Badges, and SHSM: How Do These Compare?

    The Credential Landscape Is Changing

    In today’s rapidly evolving labour market, traditional diplomas and degrees no longer tell the whole story about a learner’s skills. While formal credentials still matter, employers and post-secondary institutions increasingly look for evidence of specific competencies, applied learning, and workforce readiness. In response, short, competency-based credentials such as micro-credentials and digital badges have gained significant traction.

    Micro-credentials are designed to recognize targeted skills in flexible, employer-responsive formats. They are particularly common in post-secondary education, workforce training, and professional development. As a result, SHSM students and teachers are encountering these credentials more frequently — through colleges, online platforms, employers, and industry organizations.

    However, the rise of micro-credentials also creates confusion. Teachers and students may assume that all credentials carry the same weight or that micro-credentials can replace required SHSM certifications. Understanding what these credentials actually are, how they differ from SHSM requirements, and what post-secondary institutions truly value is essential to protecting program integrity and supporting student transitions.

    Research from the Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) confirms that while micro-credentials can play a meaningful role in skills recognition, their value depends heavily on quality assurance, employer recognition, and contextual relevance (HEQCO, 2023).

    What Are Micro-Credentials and Digital Badges?

    Micro-Credentials

    Micro-credentials are short, focused credentials that certify assessed learning in a specific skill or competency area. Unlike traditional courses or programs, they are not time-based; instead, they emphasize demonstrated mastery. Many micro-credentials are developed in collaboration with employers or industry groups to address specific workforce needs.

    According to eCampusOntario, micro-credentials are:

    • Skills-focused and outcomes-driven
    • Often completed in weeks or months rather than years
    • Designed to be stackable, meaning multiple micro-credentials may build toward a larger qualification or recognition
    • Grounded in assessment rather than participation alone (eCampusOntario, 2024)

    Digital Badges

    Digital badges are the visual and verifiable representation of learning achievement. They often accompany micro-credentials but may also represent certifications, training completion, or competency demonstrations.

    Badges typically:

    • Contain embedded metadata describing the issuing organization, criteria, and evidence
    • Can be shared on resumes, LinkedIn, portfolios, and digital wallets
    • Point to concrete proof of learning, such as projects or assessments

    In theory, badges increase transparency by allowing viewers to see what the learner actually did, not just the title of the credential (eCampusOntario, 2024).

    Important Quality Consideration

    At present, micro-credentials and badges are not governed by a single provincial regulatory body in Ontario. While frameworks such as Ontario’s Micro-Credential Quality Assurance Framework are emerging, recognition still varies widely by provider and sector (PEQAB, 2023). This means not all micro-credentials carry equal value, and teacher guidance is critical.

    How Micro-Credentials Differ from SHSM Certifications

    SHSM students already earn industry-recognized certifications and training that are mandated components of the SHSM program. These certifications are not optional enhancements — they are formal requirements outlined in Ministry policy.

    Examples include:

    • First Aid and CPR
    • WHMIS
    • Sector-specific safety or technical training
    • Workplace Essential Skills training embedded in co-op and experiential learning

    These SHSM certifications:

    • Are explicitly required by the SHSM Policy and Implementation Guide
    • Must be documented in student management systems
    • Appear on the SHSM Record and, where applicable, the Ontario Student Transcript
    • Are governed by required minimum length, duration and content
    • Are recognized by employers as foundational workplace credentials (Ontario Ministry of Education)

    By contrast, a most micro-credential:

    • Can be a SHSM course, but not necessarily
    • Are developed by post-secondary institutions or private/industry providers
    • Are not listed as required SHSM training
    • Do not automatically appear on secondary school transcripts or SHSM records
    • Serve as supplementary evidence of skill development rather than program completion

    Bottom Line Distinction

    ✔ SHSM certifications count toward SHSM completion
     ✘ Micro-credentials do not replace required SHSM certifications but can be SHSM courses if content and length meet SHSM requirements

    Micro-credentials can enhance a student’s pathway narrative when used strategically — particularly during transitions to post-secondary education or employment.

    What Postsecondary Institutions Actually Value

    When colleges and universities evaluate applicants, they do not rely on a single indicator. Instead, they assess a combination of:

    • Academic achievement
    • Evidence of relevant experiences
    • Demonstrated competencies aligned with program expectations

    Micro-credentials and badges can support applications when they clearly reinforce program fit. For example:

    • A cybersecurity micro-credential supporting an ICT or computer science pathway
    • A health-focused credential reinforcing readiness for allied health programs
    • A project-based credential demonstrating applied problem-solving or teamwork

    Post-secondary institutions value micro-credentials most when they:

    • Are issued by recognized, reputable organizations
    • Align directly with the field of study
    • Include transparent assessment criteria
    • Are supported by reflection or portfolio evidence

    Ontario colleges and universities are increasingly integrating micro-credentials into their own programming and registries, particularly through eCampusOntario’s Micro-credential Portal, which links credentials to labour market needs (eCampusOntario, 2024).

    However, institutions are cautious about generic or unverified badges that lack clear learning outcomes or employer recognition.

    Guidance for Teachers Supporting SHSM Students

    Teachers play a critical role in helping students interpret the value of micro-credentials realistically.

    Effective guidance includes:

    • Helping students articulate why a micro-credential matters for their pathway
    • Encouraging reflection pieces or portfolio artifacts alongside badges
    • Working with guidance counsellors to identify which credentials align with post-secondary expectations
    • Reinforcing that micro-credentials add depth, not replacement, to SHSM requirements

    When framed properly, micro-credentials can strengthen resumes, applications, and interviews by providing concrete talking points.

    How SHSM Teachers Can Use Micro-Credentials and Digital Badges Effectively

    1. Map credentials to sectors
       Identify which micro-credentials meaningfully align with SHSM sectors and communicate relevance clearly.
    2. Complement, don’t substitute
       Ensure required SHSM certifications are completed first. Micro-credentials should enhance, not replace, mandatory training.
    3. Support transition portfolios
       Include micro-credentials in portfolios, resumes, and application materials when they reinforce the student’s goals.
    4. Leverage employer partnerships
       Prioritize credentials recognized by employers or sector partners who can validate their relevance.

    Conclusion

    Micro-credentials and digital badges offer exciting possibilities for SHSM students — particularly as tools for demonstrating specialized skills, initiative, and self-directed learning. However, their value depends on quality, relevance, and alignment.

    It is essential to maintain a clear distinction between structured SHSM certifications required by Ministry policy and supplementary credentials that enhance a student’s pathway story (Ontario Ministry of Education). When used strategically — and grounded in student goals — micro-credentials can be a powerful complement to SHSM programming and post-secondary transition planning.

    The key is balance: embrace innovation without overclaiming its impact, and ensure every credential serves a clear, defensible purpose in the student’s journey.

    Sources

    • Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO), Micro-credentials in Ontario
    • eCampusOntario, Micro-credentials Portal and Framework
    • Postsecondary Education Quality Assessment Board (PEQAB), Ontario Micro-Credential Quality Assurance Framework
    • Ontario Ministry of Education, SHSM Policy and Implementation Guide
  • Can Students Be Paid for Placements — and Why Does It Matter?

    Can Students Be Paid for Placements — and Why Does It Matter?

    One of the questions that we always get, both from students and teachers, is can co-op students be paid for placements?

    Work placements are one of the most valuable components of both Co-operative Education (Co-op) and Specialist High Skills Major (SHSM) programs. They give students a chance to apply classroom learning in real workplaces, explore career options, and build skills that matter — regardless of whether they’re headed to apprenticeship, college, university, or the workplace. 

    But one question keeps coming up among teachers, students, and parents alike: Should a placement be paid or unpaid? The answer isn’t as simple as “paid is better.” What matters most — and what teachers need to communicate clearly — is how a work experience fits educationally and legally into SHSM and co-op requirements.

    The answer is that it depends. There is not a straightforward answer. It can change board to board with significant variance across the province.

    Understanding the Basics: What Co-op Is and Isn’t

    Co-operative Education (or “co-op”) in Ontario is a ministry-approved program that allows students to earn high school credits through workplace placements tied to their curriculum. These placements are arranged by the school and are designed to relate directly to classroom learning and career exploration. Ontario

    Most co-op placements for secondary students — including those in SHSM — are unpaid work placements. That’s because they’re fundamentally about learning, not employment. These unpaid placements earn students credits, help them explore careers, and build their portfolio of skills and experience. Ontario

    Paid vs. Unpaid: What’s the Difference (Legally & Practically)

    Unpaid Placements

    • Educationally Required: Unpaid placements are embedded within a curriculum course, especially co-op tied to SHSM. The priority is on learning outcomes, not compensation. Ontario
    • Legal Framework: In Ontario, unpaid placements are permitted only when they are part of a formal educational program — such as high school co-op, college co-ops, or professional practicums. Outside this framework, unpaid placements can violate employment standards. LaunchKO+1
    • Outcome-Focused: The goal isn’t income but skill acquisition, reflection, and documentation that aligns with curriculum expectations. Ontario

    Because SHSM requires students to complete two co-op credits directly connected to their sector, these unpaid placements are standard — and they count toward graduation and SHSM requirements. Upper Grand District School Board

    Paid Placements

    A paid placement means the student is treated as an employee under the Ontario Employment Standards Act (ESA). This has significant legal and logistical implications:

    • Minimum Wage & Employment Standards: If a student is paid, they must receive at least minimum wage and all other ESA protections (vacation pay, statutory benefits, etc.). LaunchKO
    • WSIB and Insurance: Paid students must be covered under workplace insurance appropriate to paid employees — which differs from how unpaid student placements are covered (often by the board or educational insurer). LaunchKO
    • Education vs. Employment: Paid work may not meet the Ministry of Education’s co-op criteria for curriculum-linked learning unless it is structured as a formal co-op program approved by the school. Ontario

    For SHSM students, this matters because only learning-focused placements can be counted toward co-op credits — they must include planned learning experiences, supervision, reflection, and assessment designed by the school. Ontario

    When Paid Work Can Be Compatible With SHSM Goals

    It is possible for a student to undertake paid work that supports their SHSM pathway — but not all paid jobs qualify as co-op or educational placements. Here’s how teachers can distinguish them:

    ✔ Approved Co-op Employers Offering Paid Co-op Roles

    Some employer partners are willing to pay students but structure the work as an approved co-op placement with a learning plan, supervision, and curriculum linkages. In these cases:

    • The student stays in the educational co-op framework.
    • The work still earns a co-op credit because it meets the Ministry and board criteria.
      Teachers must confirm ahead of time that the role will be treated as co-op with the school’s approval.

    ✔ Paid Work That Doesn’t Count as Co-op

    A student’s part-time job or casual paid work — even if it’s in a relevant sector — is not automatically a co-op placement. Unless the school structured it as part of a co-op course with learning objectives and assessment, it cannot be used toward SHSM requirements.

    Highlight this distinction to students: earning money is valuable, but it doesn’t substitute for co-op credit unless it’s formally recognized as such.

    Key Risks Teachers Should Help Students Avoid

    ❗ Misclassifying Work as a Co-op Placement

    A common pitfall is assuming that any job in a related sector counts as co-op. It does not — unless the school has integrated it into the co-op curriculum plan with learning, assessment, and supervision. Ontario

    ❗ Skipping Learning Plans

    Even with paid placements, students must have a Student Cooperative Education Learning Plan that identifies goals, activities, and assessment criteria before placement starts. Without it, the experience may be disallowed in SHSM audits.

    ❗ Ignoring Insurance and Legal Coverage

    Paid roles must be treated as employment; boards and employers need to establish correct insurance and safety coverage. Missteps here can put both students and schools at risk. LaunchKO

    What Teachers Should Tell Students (And Parents)

    Here are concise messages you can use with students — either in classroom presentations, individual planning, or parent communications:

    • “Paid work is great — but it only counts toward your SHSM co-op if we’ve approved it through the co-op program.”
    • “Unpaid co-op placements are educational first; they are designed to help you reflect on your learning, not just work.”
    • “Before you accept any job as part of SHSM co-op, let’s check if we can build a learning plan and link it to your curriculum.”

    Bottom Line: Protecting Students and Program Integrity

    Paid employment has real benefits — especially for students needing income — but it is not interchangeable with co-op placement unless properly structured. Unpaid co-op placements remain the core way that SHSM students earn credits, develop sector-specific skills, and demonstrate readiness for post-secondary pathways. Ontario

    Some school boards permit paid placements during summer,while others only after school. 

    Regardless of the school board position, it is important to set expectations and ensure that  students, parents and employers all understand the rules, responsibilities and expectations of the work placement.

    Your role as a teacher is to help students navigate the difference, make choices that align with both their learning and legal requirements, and ensure that every work experience counts toward their success — academically, professionally, and developmentally.

  • How Did Co-Op Requirements Change in 2025-6 for SHSM? Find Out Here…

    How Did Co-Op Requirements Change in 2025-6 for SHSM? Find Out Here…

    The Specialist High Skills Major (SHSM) program is entering the 2025–2026 school year with several important updates that directly affect how schools assign and track co-operative education credits. Although the overall structure of SHSM remains the same, the Ministry has introduced operational changes that educators need to be aware of when planning student timetables, placements, and graduation pathways.

    These changes don’t alter the purpose of SHSM or the number of co-op credits required—but they do influence how those credits can be earned and how they are recognized within the SHSM framework.

    The Co-op Requirement Itself Isn’t Changing

    Students are still required to complete two co-op credits that directly connect to their SHSM sector. This remains a core part of SHSM because it ensures every student gains authentic, sector-aligned experience—whether in health care, business, ICT, transportation, arts and culture, or any other recognized sector.

    Schools may still offer students the opportunity to earn additional co-op credits—up to six in total—depending on scheduling and placement availability. The minimum requirement, however, continues to be two.

    What Is Changing: More Flexibility in Co-op Delivery

    The most significant update for 2025–2026 is the Ministry’s expanded recognition of courses delivered under the co-op delivery type (OnSIS code “4”). Any course carrying this delivery code may now be counted toward the SHSM co-op requirement, provided the placement remains sector-relevant.

    For educators, this introduces meaningful flexibility. It allows newer or alternative co-op formats—such as community-based partnerships or innovative placement models—to be recognized more consistently. This can be especially helpful in schools that face placement shortages or run SHSM sectors with limited employer availability.

    In practice, this means schools can diversify co-op opportunities without worrying about whether the specific delivery structure will be accepted within the SHSM framework.

    New Priority Rules for Credit Allocation

    Alongside the delivery-type update, the Ministry has implemented a new system for applying credits to SHSM requirements. The updated rules prioritize credits in the following order:

    1. Higher-grade credits are applied first.
    2. When credits come from the same grade level, the earliest earned credit is applied first.

    This change is primarily administrative, but it does impact how credits appear when educators audit student progress. Guidance counsellors and SHSM leads may notice that credits populate differently in tracking tools and student information systems than they did in previous years.

    Early review of student SHSM bundles is recommended to ensure that credits are being applied as expected.

    Sector Relevance Remains Non-Negotiable

    Although schools now have more flexibility in how co-op courses are delivered, sector alignment is still mandatory. A placement must clearly match the student’s SHSM sector for the credits to count.

    This means learning plans, employer agreements, and documentation must continue to demonstrate a sector-specific connection. The expanded delivery type does not replace or reduce this requirement.

    What Schools Should Do Moving Forward

    Guidance Counsellors

    • Review how your SIS handles the new SHSM 25 credit-allocation rules.
    • Audit SHSM students’ credit progress early in the year.
    • Confirm sector relevance before approving placements.

    Co-op Teachers

    • Ensure co-op courses are using the correct delivery code.
    • Maintain strong documentation linking tasks to SHSM sectors.
    • Use the added flexibility to explore new or non-traditional placements.

    SHSM Leads / Administrators

    • Update any internal tracking sheets or checklists used for SHSM audits.
    • Share the new rules with staff involved in SHSM programming.
    • Review partnership opportunities that may now fit more easily into SHSM co-op requirements.

    A Clearer, More Flexible SHSM Landscape

    The 2025–2026 updates don’t change the heart of SHSM—they strengthen it. By providing more flexibility in co-op delivery and simplifying how credits are recognized, the Ministry has made it easier for schools to support diverse learners and offer more sector-relevant, meaningful experiences.

    For educators, the key shift is operational: the requirement stays the same, but the path toward fulfilling it is now more adaptable.

    By Carmen Reis, CPA, MA

    Carmen is the CEO of Flashpoint Training and Flashpoint Ignite. She can be reached by email at carmen@flashpointtraining.com